Cubism may not be the greatest artistic movement of contemporary art (my favourite movement of all art history is surrealism; Dalí and Magritte are like Gods to me, and I've even made some of their paintings myself), but still it makes up one of the most important and interesting parts of art history.
Pablo Picasso is certainly a model artist; he had this natural talent that not all painters had, and thus he created a lot of quite prolific, varied, and interesting works (I've made a couple of Picasso's too). When I was in Barcelona, we visited the little Picasso museum of the city in which they are basically exposed the early works of the Spaniard (although they had some paintings of this rose and blue period, and the series of 'Las Meninas'), and I must say that his first paintings are way different from his Cubist works that made him famous. I think Picasso shouldn't be judged only for his Cubist period, but for all his compilation of works.
I think playing with shapes, although it may seem easy, is one of the most demanding techniques of paintings, and being able to translate reality into a painting without portraying the objects exactly as they are is really difficult. When I painted Picasso, I could recognized it was really easy to copy, but actually coming out with the idea of using the colours and the shapes of each painting is something that only a few artists can achieve.
As I've said before, Cubism isn't my favourite artistic movement, but I shouldn't be underrated either.
I painted this Picasso's |
Picasso's 'Musicians' - My favourite from him |
Miro's sculptures in Barcelona reminded of some Cubists sculptures! |
Great, perceptive comments on Cubism! That is really interesting about the perspective errors in Picasso's "Science and Charity."
ReplyDelete